<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head First Learning Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2005/11/head-first-learning-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2005/11/head-first-learning-theory/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on everything from education and politics to internet usability, and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:27:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tag-strategia.com &#187; Goals for 2006</title>
		<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2005/11/head-first-learning-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>tag-strategia.com &#187; Goals for 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tag-strategia.com/blog/?p=22#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with other who suggest many computer science graduates are ill-prepared to design software. As I&#8217;ve mentioned before, I enjoyed reading Head First Design Patterns, and am looking forward to The Best Software Writing I, collected by Joel Spolsky from joelonsoftware.com, and a handful of other books on the subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with other who suggest many computer science graduates are ill-prepared to design software. As I&#8217;ve mentioned before, I enjoyed reading Head First Design Patterns, and am looking forward to The Best Software Writing I, collected by Joel Spolsky from joelonsoftware.com, and a handful of other books on the subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2005/11/head-first-learning-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tag-strategia.com/blog/?p=22#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Design Patterns&lt;/em&gt; is about object-oriented design, and successful patterns proven to improve code reuse and maintainability. It includes discussions about when each pattern is appropriate, inheritance versus composition, and subclasses versus interfaces. It&#039;s a wonderful programming design/theory book.

However, I initially bought the book to see how this information was presented. Because I was looking to see how learning theory was applied, (with the help of a good preface explaining the teaching methods used) I was able to recognize it, and learn from it--even though that wasn&#039;t the topic of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Design Patterns</em> is about object-oriented design, and successful patterns proven to improve code reuse and maintainability. It includes discussions about when each pattern is appropriate, inheritance versus composition, and subclasses versus interfaces. It&#8217;s a wonderful programming design/theory book.</p>
<p>However, I initially bought the book to see how this information was presented. Because I was looking to see how learning theory was applied, (with the help of a good preface explaining the teaching methods used) I was able to recognize it, and learn from it&#8211;even though that wasn&#8217;t the topic of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2005/11/head-first-learning-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tag-strategia.com/blog/?p=22#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom,

I&#039;m a wee bit on the confused side.  Is the book about the theories behind effective computer programming (making code that can be reused, meaningful variable names, small functions and subs requiring minimal documentation?)

Or is it more about how people learn in terms of how they absorb information and retain it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a wee bit on the confused side.  Is the book about the theories behind effective computer programming (making code that can be reused, meaningful variable names, small functions and subs requiring minimal documentation?)</p>
<p>Or is it more about how people learn in terms of how they absorb information and retain it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
