<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HB 148 and means-tested vouchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2007/02/hb-148-and-means-tested-vouchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2007/02/hb-148-and-means-tested-vouchers/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on everything from education and politics to internet usability, and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:29:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Utah voucher fight: Ball of confusion &#171; Millard Fillmore&#8217;s Bathtub</title>
		<link>http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2007/02/hb-148-and-means-tested-vouchers/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah voucher fight: Ball of confusion &#171; Millard Fillmore&#8217;s Bathtub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt-tag.com/blog/archives/2007/02/hb-148-and-means-tested-vouchers/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>[...] The legislature then went back and passed an amendment to the proposed voucher law, by a two-thirds majority, which means the second law cannot be submitted to a referendum. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The legislature then went back and passed an amendment to the proposed voucher law, by a two-thirds majority, which means the second law cannot be submitted to a referendum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
